_*Shadow*_ wrote:Fun (according to dictionary.com)-
something that provides mirth or amusement
Which netdecking is certainly not. Why stress for getting the money to make a deck you wanna copy?Bills,insurance,food,rent etc. are more important.Why run a $2000 deck that wins over a $50 that could do just that? Just cause people are naturally not self-dependant and rely on brilliant deck makers to Top 8 w/ an awesome deck so they can copy it and try to take credit for it.
I know it isnt against the rules its just my opinion on the matter.
So what your saying is you can have a $2000 deck but not have time to play so it makes the deck bad?! Wrong Doesnt matter how much time you have you have a DaD deck? Good for you? DaD gets pwn'd by a Batteryman deck? Lol $2000 down the drain
Did you even read what I said?
No? I will
spell it out for you then using your defintion.
SOME. PEOPLE. HAVE. FUN. IN. A. COMPETIVE. ENVIROMENT.
What I said was, some people don't have the time, and somtimes the effort to make a deck for themselves. If people want to run DAD, JD and the like. SO. WHAT? It's there choice, you shouldn't get angsty over that, expecialy if you win agasnt them.